Source index record · Single-source report · not independently verified by Palimpsest
中国西藏、尼泊尔洪灾惨况传遍全球 但在中国境内却无法看到洪灾冲击画面?
尼泊尔与中国西藏交界的喜马拉雅山区在8月26日发生暴洪与土石流,大规模暴洪和土石流淹没房屋、数百人奔逃保命等的监视器画面迅速在各国疯传,但许多家国际媒体却称中国政府全面防堵未经官方批准的灾情叙事。为何中国官方对洪灾画面也要审查?另外,中尼洪灾甚至意外引发皇马辱华争议,究竟中国网友怎么说?
Palimpsest did not write or independently verify this publisher report. The record below adds source structure, measurement context when available, revision history and limits.
Record type
Single-source report · not independently verified by PalimpsestThis record indexes one publisher group. Palimpsest has not independently verified or refuted the publisher's claims.
What Palimpsest adds
Attribution, 1 independent source group, topic links, a revision receipt and explicit unknowns. The group count is not a truth probability.
Revision receipt
eventv-ea493324a85c8e0be4d9008cPrevious: eventv-ea493324a85c8e0be4d9008c
Publisher reports · attributed, not adopted
What the registered sources published
- RFI. RFI published “中国西藏、尼泊尔洪灾惨况传遍全球 但在中国境内却无法看到洪灾冲击画面?”.
Palimpsest addition
What Palimpsest adds to this source report
Source-structure assessment · as of
Added value: Palimpsest adds attribution, independent-source grouping, a revision receipt and follow-up boundaries. It adds no independent factual finding.
Verification status: Palimpsest's view: this is a single attributed report, not an independently established fact. No archive-news-context row matches this event_id. 130 same-window events share a declared topic. Official-page corroboration coverage is none-reviewed. Declared receipts: public-deletion-ledgers. Joined peers: OONI, 2026-09-06. Quality bar two-independent-source-groups is not met.
Source structure: The dossier contains one independent source group. Palimpsest treats it as an attributed report, not independent corroboration.
Why this is the bounded position
- The dossier contains one independent source group. Palimpsest treats it as an attributed report, not independent corroboration.
- No Palimpsest collector surface is declared for this event, so the assessment stops at source structure and attribution.
Cited newsroom brief
Lead · present
- RFI published the attributed source item at 2026-09-06T15:21:13Z.
- Evidence strength is single-source across 1 independent source group and 1 attributed source record.
- Palimpsest retained feed title, canonical link, publication time, and a bounded excerpt; it did not fetch the article body.
- OONI, 2026-09-06: 43 OONI China measurements over 43 OONI measurement set.
Timeline · abstained
- official-first-seen is missing, so first-seen, last-alive, and hash-change points are omitted.
- news-wire-live is missing, so that capture time is omitted.
- A public deletion-ledger item matching this event was recorded at 2026-09-04T15:25:45Z.
- archive-news-context is missing, so archive-hit time is omitted.
Official-page movement · none-reviewed
- No live official-first-seen reading was supplied to this analysis.
- Official-page first-seen, last-alive, and hash values are withheld.
- Official-page corroboration coverage is none-reviewed: 0 accepted edges, 0 primary documents, 0 reviewed.
Deletion-ledger context · present
- A cdt ledger item matches this declared topic surface. That is a peer observation, not a Palimpsest-verified deletion.
- Palimpsest does not have its own first-seen to gone trail for this URL, so the ledger item stays a peer observation.
Pipe context · not-declared
- This event does not declare OONI, bleedthrough, vantage, or IODA signal ids, so pipe context is withheld.
Archive-derived context · abstained
- No live archive-news-context reading was supplied to this analysis.
- Host-level unique_urls, mutation_rate, archive_gap_rate, and anomaly_state are withheld.
Counterreadings
- A ledger hit can reflect the ledger's own selection rules rather than a deletion of this URL.
- A hash change or disappearance on an official page can reflect a routine update, a fetch failure, or a removal; the trail does not choose among those.
- A current pipe or undertext value can post-date the article and cannot establish that this article was blocked.
What this brief does not know
- Palimpsest does not know why any page, hash, or ledger item changed.
- Palimpsest did not read the article body and does not verify the publisher's claims.
- Person-level attribution and claims about why an actor acted are outside this brief.
Cited brief · citation coverage 1.0 · automatic publication prohibited · human review required.
Collector findings used
No collector finding is used here. Palimpsest's position is limited to remit, attribution and independent-source structure.
Attributed peer context
- greatfire. GreatFire has no cached 90-day verdict for this host in the current peer warehouse. GreatFire Analyzer, CC BY 4.0. Palimpsest is not the origin of these measurements.
- ooni. OONI has 43 China measurements on this host (anomaly rate 100.0%) as of 2026-09-06. OONI Probe / OONI data. Palimpsest is not the origin of these measurements.
- weiboscope. Historical Weiboscope volume is not on this node (Fu, Chan, Chau 2013; doi:10.25442/hku.16674565). Weiboscope / HKU Journalism and Media Studies Centre. Historical 2012 volume is not stored on this node.
Named-key interconnection
- OONI, 2026-09-06. exact host rfi.fr host
topic-surface-only · 1 joined · warehouse groups do not count as wire corroboration.
Analysis analysisv-2940280464388506e5a79336 · structured assessment · immutable revision
Evidence braid
Order, provenance and declared surfaces
-
media · france-medias-monde-rfi-editorial
中国西藏、尼泊尔洪灾惨况传遍全球 但在中国境内却无法看到洪灾冲击画面?
· feed sha bd06bec63beb
The braid reports source ordering. A declared topic surface is not a timed statistical match and cannot establish cause, coordination, censorship, or economic impact.
Evidence matrix
Inspect every receipt
Scroll horizontally to inspect every column.
| Role | Source / group | Feed record | Published / hash |
|---|---|---|---|
| media | RFIfrance-medias-monde-rfi-editorial | 中国西藏、尼泊尔洪灾惨况传遍全球 但在中国境内却无法看到洪灾冲击画面?尼泊尔与中国西藏交界的喜马拉雅山区在8月26日发生暴洪与土石流,大规模暴洪和土石流淹没房屋、数百人奔逃保命等的监视器画面迅速在各国疯传,但许多家国际媒体却称中国政府全面防堵未经官方批准的灾情叙事。为何中国官方对洪灾画面也要审查?另外,中尼洪灾甚至意外引发皇马辱华争议,究竟中国网友怎么说? | feed sha bd06bec63beb |
Measurement surfaces
Where Palimpsest can test the topic
No Palimpsest measurement surface is declared for this event. That absence is not evidence that no measurable change occurred.
Epistemic boundary
What this dossier cannot establish
- Palimpsest retained only feed title, canonical link, time, and a bounded plain-text excerpt; it did not fetch the article body.
- The evidence-strength label describes source structure, not truth, intent, impact, or causation.
- Declared instrument links are topical pointers until a separate scan or economic observation is joined by time and method.
- Title-similarity clustering can miss differently worded or cross-language accounts and can join closely worded updates.
- This dossier currently contains one independent evidence group and remains explicitly attributed.