Source index record · Single-source report · not independently verified by Palimpsest
Who Supervises the Sky Eye?
An independent journalist’s exposure of an alleged profiteering scheme surrounding a celestial observation facility shows that space for investigative reporting still exists — with limits. The post Who Supervises the Sky Eye? appeared first on China Media Project .
Palimpsest did not write or independently verify this publisher report. The record below adds source structure, measurement context when available, revision history and limits.
Record type
Single-source report · not independently verified by PalimpsestThis record indexes one publisher group. Palimpsest has not independently verified or refuted the publisher's claims.
What Palimpsest adds
Attribution, 1 independent source group, topic links, a revision receipt and explicit unknowns. The group count is not a truth probability.
Revision receipt
eventv-29c64bde16c2404a1618188cPrevious: eventv-29c64bde16c2404a1618188c
Publisher reports · attributed, not adopted
What the registered sources published
- China Media Project. China Media Project published “Who Supervises the Sky Eye?”.
Palimpsest addition
What Palimpsest adds to this source report
Collector conclusion withheld · as of
Added value: Palimpsest adds current measurement context from the named collector records below. Those measurements do not verify the publisher's article.
Verification status: Palimpsest withholds a collector-backed conclusion because one or more declared measurement surfaces are not current. No archive-news-context row matches this event_id. 73 same-window events share a declared topic. Official-page corroboration coverage is none-reviewed. Declared receipts: wayback, ddti, public-deletion-ledgers. No interconnection peer met an exact join key.
Source structure: The dossier contains one independent source group. Palimpsest treats it as an attributed report, not independent corroboration.
Why this is the bounded position
- The dossier contains one independent source group. Palimpsest treats it as an attributed report, not independent corroboration.
- 1 of 3 declared collector surfaces are not live, so Palimpsest does not issue a collector-backed view.
Cited newsroom brief
Lead · present
- China Media Project published the attributed source item at 2026-11-04T04:21:30Z.
- Evidence strength is single-source across 1 independent source group and 1 attributed source record.
- Palimpsest retained feed title, canonical link, publication time, and a bounded excerpt; it did not fetch the article body.
- No interconnection peer met an exact host, URL path, term, or ASN key inside the UTC ±24h window.
Timeline · abstained
- official-first-seen is missing, so first-seen, last-alive, and hash-change points are omitted.
- news-wire-live is missing, so that capture time is omitted.
- A public deletion-ledger item matching this event was recorded at 2026-10-27T07:23:57Z.
Official-page movement · none-reviewed
- No live official-first-seen reading was supplied to this analysis.
- Official-page first-seen, last-alive, and hash values are withheld.
- Official-page corroboration coverage is none-reviewed: 0 accepted edges, 0 primary documents, 0 reviewed.
Deletion-ledger context · present
- A cdt ledger item matches this declared topic surface. That is a peer observation, not a Palimpsest-verified deletion.
- Palimpsest does not have its own first-seen to gone trail for this URL, so the ledger item stays a peer observation.
Pipe context · not-declared
- This event does not declare OONI, bleedthrough, vantage, or IODA signal ids, so pipe context is withheld.
Archive-derived context · abstained
- No archive-news-context feature row matches this event id, URL, or declared topic surface.
Counterreadings
- A ledger hit can reflect the ledger's own selection rules rather than a deletion of this URL.
- A hash change or disappearance on an official page can reflect a routine update, a fetch failure, or a removal; the trail does not choose among those.
- A current pipe or undertext value can post-date the article and cannot establish that this article was blocked.
What this brief does not know
- Palimpsest does not know why any page, hash, or ledger item changed.
- Palimpsest did not read the article body and does not verify the publisher's claims.
- Person-level attribution and claims about why an actor acted are outside this brief.
Cited brief · citation coverage 1.0 · automatic publication prohibited · human review required.
Collector findings used
Current evidence · ddti
The directive index now tracks 177 censorship terms
The current deletion-directive index ranks 177 terms with documented censorship provenance.
177 countterms ranked
Current aggregate collector reading. It is relevant context only; the wire declares no timed, claim-specific verification join.
Method and receipt
See the complete embedded upstream payload and its raw feed
- Observed
- 08 Nov 2026 · 23:02 UTC
- Evidence
- ddti-latest.json
- SHA-256
a203ed2dd1356a5e776dcd797455f89a09130831e340fce8dc6bf3ad4096ce04
Coverage degraded · silence-index
Silence index: no current finding
No current finding is published for Silence index because the source status is degraded.
Collector status is degraded; retained values are not treated as a current finding.
Method and receipt
pre-emptive silence: topics loud abroad and gone at home, the censorship that leaves no deletion to count. Guard rails are the processor's, not this runner's: no China nexus -> out_of_scope; missing global or domestic input -> abstain; and with no coupling baseline wired (v1), a topic without gazetteer corroboration abstains rather than scores — a topic China never covered being quiet at home is disinterest, not suppression. An abstention is published as an abstention, never as a zero. DDTI terms carry china_nexus by provenance: they are drawn from the censor's own deletion stream, so this runner sets the nexus flag at source and the processor's per-term gazetteer gate is deliberately bypassed for them (it still guards any non-DDTI deployment). A blind round (nothing scored) records null blackout counts in both the latest reading and the history, never zeros
- Observed
- 09 Nov 2026 · 01:01 UTC
- Evidence
- silence-index-latest.json
- SHA-256
1360e543284dabeba796344d82984a320881346a57b14aa4706d8ca9bf8f8c85
Current evidence · wayback
Archive witnesses reconstruct 4 deletions across 21 watched URLs
Wayback evidence reconstructs 4 deletions among 21 watched URLs in the current reading.
4 countreconstructed deletions · across 21 URLs watched
Current aggregate collector reading. It is relevant context only; the wire declares no timed, claim-specific verification join.
Method and receipt
See the complete embedded upstream payload and its raw feed
- Observed
- 08 Nov 2026 · 18:09 UTC
- Evidence
- wayback-latest.json
- SHA-256
b75ad7752c003b36cbe412f49677211c25cf282d9614c9ab2d59502922c221de
Attributed peer context
- greatfire. GreatFire has no cached 90-day verdict for this host in the current peer warehouse. GreatFire Analyzer, CC BY 4.0. Palimpsest is not the origin of these measurements.
- ooni. OONI has no China measurements on this host in the local warehouse or ooni-gfw-latest reading. OONI Probe / OONI data. Palimpsest is not the origin of these measurements.
- weiboscope. Historical Weiboscope volume is not on this node (Fu, Chan, Chau 2013; doi:10.25442/hku.16674565). Weiboscope / HKU Journalism and Media Studies Centre. Historical 2012 volume is not stored on this node.
Named-key interconnection
No interconnection peer met an exact join key. no_key, silent slots remain coverage gaps, not verdicts.
Analysis analysisv-f9e4aa1e517ddf166f608af2 · structured assessment · immutable revision
Evidence braid
Order, provenance and declared surfaces
-
research · china-media-project-research
Who Supervises the Sky Eye?
· feed sha 304ae6c6d15d
-
Declared topic surfaces · not a causal match
scan:ddti · scan:silence-index · scan:wayback
A timed measurement join has not been asserted by this dossier.
The braid reports source ordering. A declared topic surface is not a timed statistical match and cannot establish cause, coordination, censorship, or economic impact.
Evidence matrix
Inspect every receipt
Scroll horizontally to inspect every column.
| Role | Source / group | Feed record | Published / hash |
|---|---|---|---|
| research | China Media Projectchina-media-project-research | Who Supervises the Sky Eye?An independent journalist’s exposure of an alleged profiteering scheme surrounding a celestial observation facility shows that space for investigative reporting still exists — with limits. The post Who Supervises the Sky Eye? appeared first on China Media Project . | feed sha 304ae6c6d15d |
Measurement surfaces
Where Palimpsest can test the topic
Epistemic boundary
What this dossier cannot establish
- Palimpsest retained only feed title, canonical link, time, and a bounded plain-text excerpt; it did not fetch the article body.
- The evidence-strength label describes source structure, not truth, intent, impact, or causation.
- Declared instrument links are topical pointers until a separate scan or economic observation is joined by time and method.
- Title-similarity clustering can miss differently worded or cross-language accounts and can join closely worded updates.
- This dossier currently contains one independent evidence group and remains explicitly attributed.